* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
What makes a species endangered? A trained biologist’s quick
stab at a general answer would be “a loss of biodiversity”, meaning no longer having
a wide range of species living in a system, so they interact with each other,
and provide checks and balances for each other.
In simple terms, a forest is more than just a bunch of
trees. A plantation of pine trees (or any other trees, for that matter) is not
really a forest because it is a monoculture, and worse than that, all of the
trees are of the same age, with no old growth forest.
At times, populations may rise and fall in old growth
forest, but over a long enough period of time, there is a balance in the
species found there. In any ecosystem, very few species are really essential.
In most cases,
a species which is eliminated will be replaced in its function by some other
species, either one that is present already, or one that moves in when a
competitor is removed. Unfortunately, there are a few species that are keystone
species, and like the keystone in a stone arch, take that away, and the whole
structure will collapse.
Worse, some unexpected and inconspicuous life form may
prove to play an essential role, so that removing a mere fungus, or a tiny mammal,
or an insignificant spider, may be all that is needed to trigger wild swings in
populations that eliminate more species, until all that is left is sterile
ground.
What this means is that if there is an endangered
species in a forest or any other ecosystem, the whole community may be at risk.
In the same way, if biodiversity, the range of species present, is reduced,
other species will be put at risk.
While biodiversity, having a range of species present,
is important, it is equally as important to have genetic diversity within each species, a range of genetic
adaptations that may be needed in a population under different conditions.
This is an important consideration when zoos are engaged
in captive breeding programs, where it is important to exchange animals from
different zoo populations, or where it may even be necessary to remove a
dominant male who is siring too many offspring.
Biodiversity can be affected in many ways. One serious
problem comes from introduced species which usually have no controls in their
new environment. Introduced species can arrive either by themselves, carried by
the wind, the waves, or migrating birds, but many more arrive when aircraft or
ships carry species to new places, deliberately, or by accident.
Yet other species just invaded with humans. Hawaii has a
problem with what they regard as the brown tree snake of Guam (Boiga irregularis). This snake wiped out
many bird species on Guam after it arrived there from either Australia or New
Guinea, probably by plane during World War II. In recent times, it has been
known to travel to the islands of Micronesia by plane, riding in cargo crates.
With no natural predators and no competition from other
species, it thrived on Guam. Twelve bird species have since disappeared from
the island, and several others are approaching extinction, and lizards, small
mammals and domestic poultry are under threat.
Even forest trees are at risk, now that the birds that
pollinate their flowers have been wiped out. In the next century, gaps will
begin to appear in the canopies of these forests. Usually, spindly young trees
live on the forest floor, waiting for an opening to give them light to grow.
When a gap appears, they race to be the first to plug the gap, but in time,
there will be no seeds, and no small trees lying in wait.
Native bat numbers are also down. Yet in spite of all
this damage, it was almost 50 years before the snake was identified as the
cause of the decline in bird numbers on Guam.
In their own environment, most species are controlled,
because over time, predators and diseases have evolved ways to eat them or kill
them, so that when their numbers increase, there is a natural checking system
in place.
When outside species arrive in a new place, there are no
predators available to control them, so the only real population control comes
when they run out of food. By the time that happens, they are likely to have
reduced a number of food species, and a number of competitors which rely on
that resource, to the brink of extinction.
When rats were accidentally introduced into New Zealand,
for example, they found a number of ground-nesting birds, whose eggs were an
excellent food source. Because there were a number of bird species, and because
rats can eat many other things as well, the rats could continue to flourish,
even when the bird numbers crashed.
In Australia, many small marsupials found themselves
facing a double threat. The first half came from rabbits, which out-competed
and outbred them, while sheep and cattle reduced the available food and also
changed the habitats forever.
If that wasn’t enough, the second threat came from foxes
and feral cats, which were able to survive on rabbits, but found the small
marsupials to be easy and tasty morsels. Once again, even when their numbers
crashed, the predators were able to live on rabbit, while still taking the odd
marsupial.
The small marsupials, generally ranging in size from
about that of a mouse to that of a young rabbit, were able to survive normal
predation from dingoes, but introducing rabbits allowed dingo numbers to
increase. As we will see in a moment, that brought a further problem for the
small marsupials.
Another threat, at least to some animals, can be hunting,
usually for food, but also for trophies, or even because of rarity. One of the
best-documented hunting extinctions is the story of the great auk, a flightless
bird that looked like a cross between a duck and a penguin.
We really should look at the auk, so that's up next.