Sulphur-crested cockatoo,
Cacatua galerita.
|
As a noun, Australians know three meanings for
"cocky". It can be a cockroach, or a parrot-like bird, or a farmer.
The second and third meanings are said to be related, and the farmer version
goes back some distance: Elizabeth Ramsay-Laye encountered it around 1853:
Further on we
passed close to a very flourishing little farm, and on my pointing it out to
one of the Miss R——’s, she said, “Oh! a cockatoo.” Thinking she had
misunderstood me, I said, “I mean that pretty little farm.” “Yes,” she
repeated, “we call that a ‘cockatoo;’ small farmers who settle themselves on
another person’s run are so called here.” This perhaps gives the best idea of
an Australian run, when such an intrusion is of no moment.
— Elizabeth
Ramsay-Laye, Social Life and Manners in
Australia, 1861, 50.
Breaker Morant used the term "cocky" in one of his rollicking verses
in 1894.
It was a Western
manager, and a language-man was he,
Thus spoke he to
the shed-boss*: “Send ‘The Rager’ round to me;
I’ll hie me to the
office where I’ll write his crimson cheque,
Bid him roll his
dusty swag up, or I’ll break his no-good neck.”
So when the bell
was ringing—when “smoke-oh” time was o’er,
Says the
shed-boss, “Mick, your services are wanted here no more.”
Then “The Rager”
hung his shears up, stepped from the shearing floor,
And went
a-swapping swear-words round at the office-door.
For the boss began
to language, and “The Rager” languaged back;
Says “The Rager”,
“There’s my brother, can’t you give him, too, the sack?”
“Your brother? D—n
your brother! Yes, send him round here quick!”
“That narks yez,”
Michael answered—”he’s a cocky down in Vic*.”
— Breaker Morant
(1856 – 1902), 1894.
Two points of translation here: the shed boss was a shearing
shed supervisor and "Vic" is the state of Victoria.
wet cocky |
wet cocky |
There are two alleged and related derivations of
cocky-the-farmer: either early settlers, sowing seed, found that the cockatoos
came and dug them up, causing them to say "Look at me paddock — I'm just
growing cockies," and the other is similar. Basically, a cocky is a
small-scale farmer, and we speak of cow-cockies, wheat-cockies, and might
discuss sheep-cockies.
My interest is with the feathered variety. This is Saturday,
it's raining, and two cockies came to visit. They often perch on the light
fitting, outside my study: see the picture above. Two wet ones sat on the
balcony railing today, probably hoping for a feed, but anybody feeding them is
asking for trouble. These birds are gangsters, and they move around in mobs,
and feeding them is to invite an invasion of extremely destructive birds who
can shred timber and rubber trims.
Some 30 years ago, a neighbour who was a bit of a fruit
loop, had a cocky problem of his own making. He would run around his balcony,
flailing at them with a big stick, but they liked it there, and just moved out
of reach.
Somebody (and we all knew who) tracked them to their
roosting tree, threw a string over a branch, and hauling up two sticks of
gelignite, and setting them off at night. The police helicopter came around,
suspecting thieves had been trying to "blow" a safe, but they found
nothing: we found a few feathers under the tree, but there was no drop in the
cocky population.
This one was feeding on seeds, but got into an embarrassing
position when the two stalks it was hanging onto, gave way under its weight,
making it "do the splits".
We laughed, and it rewarded us with a dirty look and a
scream: the thing our neighbour objected to most was their raucous screeching.
From my study window, I can see across a broad valley, about
3 km across, and sometimes, there can be a flock of 60 or so, racing back and
forth, screaming. Take it from me: the sounds carry.
Still, cockatoos are part of the bush, and they even roost
there: I caught this one popping out of its hollow tree one day, and this pic
will probably go into the new book that I signed off on yesterday, as an
example of how animals use resources.
One last picture, though, to illustrate a piece of
vernacular which the British claim as their own, though I think it sounds more
Australian. That is "as sick as a parrot", and to illustrate this,
here is a cockatoo that was carrying "beak and feather disease".
This, I am told is a virus disease, first reported from
Australia in the 19th century. This bird was a member of a flock, which means
there was a risk of transmission, but I have seen no other cases in the area.
Anyhow, if you want to know what "sick as a
parrot" looks like, this will show you.
Cockroaches, by the way, were a matter of shame:
And you should never own to a mosquito. I once unfortunately stated to a Queensland gentleman that my coat had been bitten by cockroaches at his brother’s house, which I had just left. ‘You must have brought them with you then,’ was the fraternal defence immediately set up. I was compelled at once to antedate the cockroaches to my previous resting-place, owned by a friend, not by a brother. ‘It is possible,’ said the squatter, ‘but I think you must have had them with you longer than that.’ I acquiesced in silence, and said no more about my coat till I could get it mended elsewhere.— Anthony Trollope, Australia and New Zealand, London: 1873, 67.
But it seems we had cockroaches quite early, going on this:
To repel the Cock-roach. — Take a small quantity of white arsenic finely pulverised, strew it on crumbs of bread, and lay it near their haunts; a few nights will suffice.
And even earlier, in 1820, Lt. (later Admiral) King tried to deal with pests in the cutter he was using to map Australia's coasts:— Launceston Advertiser, 20 December 1830, 4, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/84776042
The cutter was careened at a place appointed for the purpose on the east side of Sydney Cove; and whilst undergoing her repair the crew lived on board a hulk hired for the occasion. This offered so favourable an opportunity for destroying the rats and cockroaches with which she was completely overrun, a measure that, from the experience of our last voyage, was considered absolutely necessary for our comfort as well as for our personal safety, that, as soon as the operation of coppering and caulking was finished, she was secured alongside of the hulk, and there immersed in the water for several days, by which process we hoped effectually to destroy them.Upon the vessel being raised and the water pumped out, I was rejoiced to find that the measure appeared to have had the desired effect; but, before we left Port Jackson, she was again infested by rats, and we had not been long at sea before the cockroaches also made their appearance in great numbers. In sinking the cutter it seemed, in respect to the insects, that we had only succeeded in destroying the living stock, and that the eggs, which were plentifully deposited in the recesses and cracks of the timbers and sides, proved so impervious to the sea-water, that no sooner had we reached the warmer climate, than they were hatched, and the vessel was quickly repossessed by them; but it was many months before we were so annoyed by their numbers as had been the case during the last voyage.— Lt. P. P. King, Narrative of a Survey of the intertropical and western coasts of Australia.
No comments:
Post a Comment