There are most definitely mad inventors: imagine how the operator of this machine is going to dismount! |
It was written in 2009, and published once before in a defunct blog. I have pulled it out and polished it up a bit, because regrettably, most of it still holds true, except that now the mad pollies who formerly foamed in the background have now taken charge.
If I asserted that the world
was flat, and a politician heard me, would he (these idiots are almost always male) then demand that scientists explain
why it wasn't flat before they spent lots of taxpayer money to launch a satellite?
An idiot who shall remain nameless has just burst onto the airwaves with his news that a conference he attended was told that solar flares account better for global warming, so before we do anything, the scientists have some explaining to do.
An idiot who shall remain nameless has just burst onto the airwaves with his news that a conference he attended was told that solar flares account better for global warming, so before we do anything, the scientists have some explaining to do.
Yeah, right, Nero, and we'll
keep the fire brigade in reserve, will we, until we know that Rome's really
burning? What's that? You want them to come along to your violin performance? OK
. . .
Sorry, we return now to our
transmission. But you know, don't you, that this sort of rubbish rhetoric is the stock-in-trade of a certain style of politician. It's enough to make any scientist mad as hell.
Kurt Lambeck, president
of the Australian Academy of Science, had some strong
things to say in 2009 about the global warming "sceptics" in Ockham's
Razor, and you can read them at http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2009/2589206.htm#transcrip...,
but I have to wonder why uninformed twits like the unnamed polly feel that they
have a democratic right to deny the science, simply because a half-baked idiot at a conference with curiously shady funding denied
the science.
As Luis Alvarez, no mean scientist
himself, commented once: "There is no democracy in physics. We can't say that
some second-rate guy has as much right to opinion as Fermi." Mind you, Alvarez
was talking about physics among physicists. I hate to think what he would have to
say about the polly wanting to derail everything just because he's been conned by
snake oil merchants.
I think the polly feels free
to thump his tub and posture in public because so many of the uninformed, the unwashed
and the unwary (i.e., people like him) subscribe to the view that all scientists
are mad scientists. If you can dismiss scientists as mad, then you may feel free
to call into question the careful, but often hard-to-understand views of the scientists.
The world is flat, you muppet, anybody can see that, and if you don't, you must
be mad!
So: are there mad scientists? Or mad people with scientific tendencies?
If you are a forensic psychiatrist
in a secure unit, you are bound to seek an outlet for your creativity. Around you,
psychotic patients are pursuing the patenting of their inventions for inflatable
moon buggies and the like, and it occurred to David James and Paul Gilluley that
the British Patent Office might be a repository of psychotic ideas, so they went
on a trawl.
Oddly, they were unable to find
evidence of mad inventors, but they nonetheless described their experiences. The
abstract is at http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/12/764
-- if you go there, you can download the PDF of James, David V. and Paul L. Gilluley,
Psychotic patients and patent applications: The mad scientist revisited?, Psychiatric
Bulletin (1997) 21: 764-768.
The authors surveyed unusual
patents and authors with unusual track records, but found nothing as odd as what
their patients wished to patent. Unabashed, they wallowed in nutty inventions, and
later, shared the tastes, sights and sounds. Their conclusion: "the only creative
'mad scientists' are those who were creative scientists before they became mentally
ill". I was glad to read that.
Definitely recommended for a
few light moments, and even a bit of serious introspection.
I wonder why there have been no studies of mad politicians. It certainly isn't for lack of material!
PS
A couple of hours after posting this, I found this account of shonky doings behind the climate change deniers, here in New Zealand. Read it, and get mad!
I wonder why there have been no studies of mad politicians. It certainly isn't for lack of material!
PS
A couple of hours after posting this, I found this account of shonky doings behind the climate change deniers, here in New Zealand. Read it, and get mad!
No comments:
Post a Comment