Once upon a time,
they say, there was a wonderful Golden Age of scientific communication, an age
when the most prominent scientists and admiring lay-people were in frequent
contact, either with each other, or with each others’ works. To exist at all
this age probably had to await the development of the railway, the telegraph,
and machine type-setting.
I suspect this
Golden Age came at the absolute height of public scientific interest and
endeavour, a time when scientific creativity was pouring out all over the
place, and discoveries sparked off other discoveries, almost at the speed of
light. All that was required was the transmission of the original idea.
Calculating what
destroyed the Golden Age is harder: it might be sufficient to blame television,
but the era probably died earlier than that. Maybe there never was any Golden
Age of science communication at all. One thing is certain, though: there was a
definite Dark Ages for scientific communication, and they died out around 1800,
when scientific journals were first published, including the journal which
nearly robbed Alessandro Volta of his rightful credit.
If you were a
scientist in provincial England in the late 1700s, or worse yet, in colonial
Australia, tidings of new discoveries were an unconscionably long time coming,
and much of the news came only in the form of private mail. This helps to
explain why so many scientists banded together to share their news, but what I
find harder to explain is why a few of these groups were so hugely successful.
Groups like the Lunar Society of Birmingham, for example.
The ‘Lunatics’ got
their name from their solution to the risks of travelling the dangerously
rutted roads around Birmingham to get to their meetings. It was unsafe to
travel those roads in the dark of a moonless night, so they would meet on the
night of the full moon. The real problem with Birmingham was that it might have
been a good place for building a factory, but it was the most dreadful starting
place for a trip to London.
It wasn’t much
better for getting to Edinburgh from either, the city where so many of the
members had learned their science. They might as well have been in the
colonies! For any sort of intellectual stimulation, they and their friends had
to rely on what came to hand in their home town, or near to it.
They were a tightly
interlinked and brilliant little group, and the Royal Society in London had
nothing on them. The Royal Society’s members were a bunch of dullards and
dilettantes by comparison. Upper Class twits, Tories, that sort of thing,
nothing like the Birmingham mob at all.
And that brings us
to one of the problems with the Birmingham Lunatics: they were seen as a mob of
radicals, people who felt American and French Revolutions were Good Things and
said so, which wasn’t a good idea, for the spirit of a former-day Senator
McCarthy was alive and well in eighteenth century England.
At one point, the
mob even burned down Priestley’s house to show what they thought of him. If
‘Congreves’ (the matches, that is, named because, like the incendiary rockets
of Sir William Congreve, they set fire to things) had been invented back then,
they might have got Joseph Priestley as well, but they had to send off for
‘some fire’, and Priestley made his escape. Recall, though, that while the
members called themselves ‘Lunatics’, it was a real lunatic, Farmer George,
King of England, who tried to get the Royal Society to reverse its stand on
lightning rods, simply to contradict the American rebel, Benjamin Franklin.
You will find this
story elsewhere. To its credit, the Royal Society refused the King’s demand,
but Farmer George would never have tried the same stunt on the Lunar Society of
Birmingham. After all, one of their corresponding members was that same
villainous Ben Franklin, and one of the Society’s sources of inspiration (some
call him a founder), William Small, had been the teacher of Thomas Jefferson in
America, and had now come to Britain.
The other founders
included a country doctor, Erasmus Darwin, who is fairly well-known as
grandfather to Charles Darwin, but Erasmus was quite an intellectual giant in
his own right. As we have seen, long before Charles got into the evolution
business, Erasmus had proposed a Lamarckian sort of evolution, beating
Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck to the idea by a number of years.
Charles’ other
grandfather, Josiah Wedgwood was a member as well. So was William Withering,
who discovered that the foxglove plant contained a steroid substance which we
call digitalis, and use for heart disease.
It didn’t take long
for other members to come rolling up, and the effectiveness of such a society
soon became obvious. This was a time of breakthroughs and new ideas, a time for
rapid development. It was also a time of simple apparatus to measure the
extents of simple principles, so almost any participant could experiment
further.
As I mentioned,
they were mostly trained at that cradle of scientific education, the University
of Edinburgh, and many of them were involved in manufacturing, so new problems
arose quite frequently, nice knotty problems for the others to tackle.
But what would it
take to establish a similar Golden Age of science and science communication and
application today? Was there a magical formula, or was it just good fortune
that so many people came together and sparked off each other? Was it because
they were elitist, or only attracted an elite? As newsgroups, fora and email
lists develop and mature on the Internet, will they begin to fill that role?
Only time can tell
— but I think the email list is already dying away.
Hey Pete, this might not qualify for the Lunar Society but maybe a twilight affliction.
ReplyDeleteIn the early 80s I was working on the sugar cane which was wonderful as a work environment and necessitated me staying in the caravan park. I have never had much of a head for intoxicant, alcohol not too bad but real mind bending stuff I didn't have the courage for but always enjoyed hearing others personal experiences. In the park I enjoyed for conversation only the company of Angie who was an expert in LSD but had retained her mind. One thing that stuck in my mind was how she watched colour TV all night 10 years before a colour set had even landed in the country.
Some years later I was down in Tassie trying to learn things and as poverty would have it I only had a gifted black and white TV and colour had been in over 10 years.
One afternoon I was watching a very good kid's science show and the bloke had a spinning wheel with intermittent black and white squares. I didn't have to turn the colour off like everyone else and whacko, just as was said, at a certain speed, a colour image appeared. Not crisp but fascinating and I rang the ABC locally and was fortunate to talk to a techy who hadn't seen it but got into the spirit of the thing. I told him about Angie's experience and others who said under the drug everything can be seen as vibrating. He said that as a TV picture is made up of millions of flashing dots it would explain why at a certain frequency the colour would appear. If Angie's vision was distorted maybe the same phenomenon was at work. What do make of it?
Cheers, Stew.
I'm just going out for a bushwalk. The answer lies in Benham's Top, of which I will have more to say in a day or two.
ReplyDelete