Search This Blog

Monday, 30 April 2018

The Microscopist's Mate, part 6 of many

Just for the record, all of what you find here, and in the other blogs in this series, is now available in fuller detail in my e-book Looking at Small Things.  Go to this link to find out more about how to get the free low-resolution copy, or the cheap high-resolution version: I'm a professional writer, so I like selling books, but I'm also a professional educator, so I like sharing ideas.

There's a similar free or cheap deal on offer for my Playwiths ebook as well, and to see what else I have been doing (LOTS!), go to this link.

(Edit 40/4/2018) Links to previous parts:
Part 1Part 2,  Part 3Part 4Part 5 

Right now, I am designing activities for young people using the Go Macro, and I have just comprehensively sorted out the focal plane problem. In simple terms, a natural leaf is curved, and that means part of it are out of the shallow focal plane that we are restricted to.

My usual solution is to use a microscope slide, to flatten the leaf out and hold it in the focal plane, but while I have microscope slides to hand, other people may not. Incidentally, the leaf is resisting a bit here, but when I rest the Go Macro lens on it, it flattens down, soon enough.


Once upon a time, things came in little boxes made of cardboard or even wood (like the matchboxes of my youth). Classier things like chocolates came in boxes made of tinplate, and I still carry my specimen tubes in a Barkley Mints tin, which is recent enough to have a barcode on it, or a neat little PVC box that rattles less. That said, the norm, now is transparent polystyrene boxes.

Most of the bits and pieces sitting on my desk are in chocolate boxes of that sort, so the idea of using them jumped into my head:

Notice the box at the bottom: you will see it in use in the next picture:

Maybe you aren't a chocaholic, though, so I cast around for other solutions:

The lid of a CD "crystal case" also works, and so do the polystyrene Petri dishes that I commonly use for the same purpose. Each of these has a small drawback: a small vertical flange, for want of a better term. This stops the base making a firm contact with the table or desk top, bu that is precisely what we want, so the sample lies, flattened, in the focal plane. The answer is simple: slip a microscope slide or a piece of cardboard under the leaf.

Now we are cooking with gas!

Oh, if you want to buy slides or Petri dishes, I have no relationship with these people, but I have had nothing but prompt service from Australian Entomological Supplies. I note that the owner died recently, but it appears that orders are still being processed.

Here are a couple of samples from this morning: I am trying to get good shots of the silica hairs on grass leaves.



Well, I'm still tweaking...

Saturday, 21 April 2018

Mosquitoes and flies

I'm writing like crazy, and the computer starts falling over. I press on, using the MacBook, that starts ruining my back, so I buy a new computer, and now I have to master Win 10, tame it and make it look like Windows 3.1.

I'm almost there. Here's something off the spares pile, OK?

* * * * * * * * * * *
Housefly, stitched together from a dozen or so shots taken at different focal lengths through a monocular microscope. Software of choice was ImageJ which is public domain and free: get it at https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/


High summer sees rainy periods, and soon after, the mosquitoes begin to swarm in our gardens, making people complain.  Around the world, every land seems to claim to have the worst, most bitingest mosquitoes.  So how do Australian ‘mossies’ rank internationally?

Oscar Comettant was a French visitor, who wrote this just over a hundred years ago: ‘In Australia, as everywhere, the mosquitoes sing their irritating “perpetual melody”, an imitation of Wagner.’  I think we may conclude from this that M. Comettant disliked Wagner, rather more than the mosquitoes.

But then Charles Sturt was an early English explorer, who wrote this in about 1830:

‘We . . should have been tolerably comfortable, had not the mosquitoes been so extremely troublesome.  They defied the power of smoke, and annoyed me so much, that, hot as it was, I rolled myself in my boat cloak, and perspired in consequence to such a degree, that my clothes were wet through, and I had to stand at the fire in the morning to dry them.’

Yet Anthony Trollope, writing in 1873, when he was already a well-known novelist, dismissed our mossies as a mere nothing: 

‘And I may add to this that Australian mosquitoes, of which I had heard much and which I feared greatly, were never so venomous to me as mosquitoes have been in other countries, nor are they in force for so large a proportion of the year.  The mosquito of Australia is a poor, impotent and contemptible creature as compared, for instance, with the mosquito of the United States.’

On the other hand, Mrs Louisa Meredith was a Sydney resident in the 1840s, living almost on the site of the Olympics in the year 2000.  She wrote:

‘But worse than [the flies] are the mosquitoes, nearly as numerous, and infinitely more detestable to those for whose luckless bodies they form an attachment, as they do to most new comers; a kind of initiatory compliment which I would gladly dispense with, for most intolerable is the torment they cause in the violent irritation of their mountainous bites.’

It seems that their judgements are all highly subjective, perhaps being related to skin sensitivity.  These days, the mosquito is a minor problem in the cities, for most houses are entirely screened against insects, but they still remain a serious pest out of doors.  Malaria occurs only in the far north of Australia, though global warming may affect that in the future, spreading that disease into major population centres.

In parts of Australia, we need to set up traps for mosquitoes, in order to sample them on a regular basis.  There are a number of very nasty local virus infections spread by mossies, and the traps help us to find out when these diseases are likely to be a problem.

The traps use dry ice (solid CO2) to bring the mosquitoes in close to the trap (mosquitoes fly upwind when they meet a CO2 gradient), then drawing them in with a small electric lamp, as the mosquitoes end their run by looking for infrared (warmth).

This is a nifty way to get close to a mammal, but it may be a problem for the main thesis of Michael Crichton's ‘Jurassic Park’, that mosquitoes in amber are likely to carry dinosaur blood.  Unless Bob Bakker is right, and the dinosaurs were warm-blooded. . ..

In the Riverina area, a single trap may score as many as 7000 mossies in a night.  These are sorted, blended, and tested for viral markers that indicate how serious the danger of viral disease is at any given time.

All of which is by way of an introduction to a bizarre mosquito that I rediscovered with my young son recently, when we dipped a net into a brine pool, and found a huge haul of mosquito wrigglers.  Just one mosquito species lays its eggs in brine pools beside the sea, where the wrigglers thrive, just above the high tide mark.  It appears that only this species, Aedes australis, has this ability.  The trick makes sense, for they have the same advantage as a lone kid in a lolly-shop: all those resources, and nobody to compete with for them!

The brine pools arise from salt spray that drifts and splashes into a hollow, later to evaporate, leaving the salt behind.  In extreme cases, the pools may be encrusted with salt crystals, but even this does not deter these hardy brutes.  I brought some home, to keep in test tubes with different brine concentrations, serially diluted.  The three highest salt levels killed normal wrigglers within an hour, but did nothing at all to A. australis, which even did quite nicely in distilled water.