This went to air on the ABC on Sunday 29 October 2006 8:45AM,
and you can still listen to it through this link, if you wish. One reason for placing this here
is that Jeff McGill has just been in touch with me to correct a couple of
points. I have sought and gained his permission to add his comments as a guest
blog: you can find it here.
I keep a standard CV ready for the times when po-faced
people ask me for an account of my experience, skills and habits. Among other
thing, it says, more or less truthfully, that my hobbies include walking up small mountains slowly and sitting on top of small mountains wondering how to
get down. Last September, I re-defined my sense of 'small', but I never planned
it that way.
Another hobby is having temporary obsessions, cascades of
curiosity that end up as talks like this, or books. This time, my obsession was
with explorers in Australia and the methods they used. It will probably end up
as a book, but it's had me off chasing all sorts of oddities. I rode camels in
Central Australia a couple of years back, in part to work out how John Horrocks
came to be shot by his camel.
This time my target was a mountain in the central west of
New South Wales, a peak that John Oxley spotted from 130 kilometres away in
1818. By world standards, we have sad mountains in Australia. Our highest peak
is barely 2200 metres above sea level, and most ranges are much less.
The Warrumbungles are volcanic remnants in central New South
Wales, the result of our tectonic plate having passed over a hotspot some
millions of years ago. Mount Exmouth reaches 1206 metres, making it the highest
peak in the Warrumbungles. There used to be a road part of the way up, but
that's long since closed, so I walked all the way from a car park at about 330
metres, but I thought I had started out much higher up. I'd looked at an old
map and when I was thinking about walking up Mount Exmouth, I assumed the top
of the old road was my starting place. This was not a good idea.
I'd looked at the contours and worked out the vertical part
of the climb, going from the top of the old road about 750 metres above sea
level. When I found the road wasn't there any more, I forgot to look at the map
again, and missed noticing that I was starting much lower down. I headed off,
expecting to walk up a small mountain and sit on it, but I was much more than
450 metres below the summit.
The first part is suitable even for old-age pensioners
(indeed I met two British OAPs as I was walking out), and while it rises a bit,
maybe 30 metres from end to end, it isn't extreme. Then you come to the old
road, and that suddenly becomes steep pinch after steep pinch. It's pleasant
enough if you can make your own pace, and because it bends, it's deceptive. You
go up a rise, turn, and find another rise, or on one occasion, two kangaroos
hurtling down the track. In one straight line it would be heartbreaking; here,
it offers constant variety.
I always wear Volley sandshoes when I walk. This upset our
English guide in the Troodos mountains of Cyprus recently; she wanted me to
wear boots, until I showed her the soles and explained that roofing contractors
here wear nothing else. Her eyes flickered at this curious Australian custom,
then another Australian in our group clarified, 'On their feet', he said.
This kangaroo saw me coming and stood his ground. |
Something like 250 metres to go! |
I realised my error, that the total climb was more like 850 metres, not 450. I'd now climbed 600 metres, not 200 metres, but having gone that far, I thought I would try a bit more. My legs were querulous but I spoke sternly to them. We would do the last 250 metres, I snarled.
The final climb begins as a narrow trace across and up a
scree of loose rock. There was nothing too daunting, but the track drives
steeply up to a bend and then doubles back on itself. Off the scree, there's a
flat bit through trees, before the path slides up the mountainside again.
At one point I needed to work around a rock face carefully, with
strands of fencing wire strung between two trees behind me. It was slippery,
nothing dangerous, but I'd seen no fresh footprints on the way up (and I was in
fact the only person up that far that day), so I knew help would be a while
coming.
I'd posted a walk plan, giving 8.pm as the alarm time to send out searchers, which now seemed a bit late. So I needed to go extra carefully over stuff I wouldn't think twice about down at sea level. There was a steep drop below me, so I just took my time, leaning in and keeping three limbs attached at all times. Serious climbers might sneer at my Nervous Nellie technique, but I felt safer.
I'd posted a walk plan, giving 8.pm as the alarm time to send out searchers, which now seemed a bit late. So I needed to go extra carefully over stuff I wouldn't think twice about down at sea level. There was a steep drop below me, so I just took my time, leaning in and keeping three limbs attached at all times. Serious climbers might sneer at my Nervous Nellie technique, but I felt safer.
That eagle only came close when I wasn't ready. |
So I just kept plodding up the track, wondering if I really needed all this. Suddenly, I was on top. Well, I was on the ridge, and that meant I only had little jump-ups along the ridge to the peak. My knees groaned a bit, but in the end, they jumped.
It was a perfect day for being on top of a mountain; two
days later, I drove past, coming back from the west, and the peak was all
wrapped in cloud. But that day I had a perfect monarch-of-all-I-survey view of
the Warrumbungles. I ate salami, cheese and dried apples, I drank water, I
mooched.
On top of the world. |
That teasing eagle stayed well up, but kept flying so its
shadow passed over me - it had to be deliberate - and because it was in the
sun, I was unable to capture it with the camera. It circled at a distance until
a second eagle came into view. They flew wingtip to wingtip, then the new bird
rolled over and grasped at the first eagle with its talons, after which the two
of them dropped, talons together, falling down the sky before they parted,
recovered, and did it again. I wondered at this: was it a mating display or
aggression? As far as I could see, they never made actual contact with their
feet.
My knees continued to remind me that they're elderly. They'd
had enough, they averred. Four hours from starting, I headed back down, each
step carefully placed. The day wasn't hot, but I still used most of the four
litres of water I took. I never used my kiwi jacket, my sweater, the extra
food, the torch or the other emergency stuff, but they were insurance. Best of
all, I didn't use the bivvy bag, an orange plastic sack large enough to put
broken people in to keep them warm, dry and visible. I've carried it for 19
years, and never needed it yet.
It took three hours of slow and careful treading to get back
to the car. I swore occasionally at Mr Oxley, who said that he got up there in
two brisk hours, and seems to describe the route I was on. Like most of the
so-called explorers, he was probably following what some of them called 'a
native road', in other words, a foot track worn by generations of Aboriginal
feet.
It was a hard climb. |
John Oxley visited that hill in 1818, saw the Warrumbungles, the Arbuthnot Range, as he called it, and decided to go there. He saw the Great Dividing Range from Mount Exmouth, and decided to push on to Walcha and then to the coast at Port Macquarie. Mount Harris is north of Warren and far enough west for the flies to be bad already. It was of course, the only day that my trusty fly veil wasn't in my pack.
Photography in dense fly swarms is no fun, as anybody who's
been in the high country in summer will know. In spite of the flies, in spite
of no veil, I came back with 500 pictures. It was spring, and there'd been rain
in the west. Not a lot, but enough to make flies and wildflowers flourish.
The area's dead flat, right across the flood plain, so I was
amused at one point to find a flood depth indicator in the middle of nowhere.
It would be most useful in a flood to have a sign telling you that you'd been
driving in two metres of water for the past five or ten kilometres.
It's the sort of country where explorers climb trees or each
other's backs in desperation, seeking the sight of a landmark, any landmark, on
the horizon. There are no 35-metre trees, so a hillock reaching that locally
amazing height is a boon, especially when a person on top can see an
interesting peak, almost 130 kilometres away.
Explorers like distant landmarks to take sights on as they
travel, because it helps them map their way. One of my beefs with the school
curriculum is that trigonometry would be a lot more interesting if the
applications of triangulation were given better coverage in maths classes, and
it'd be nice if the reliance of explorers on 'native roads' became an element
in the history class.
Anyhow, there I was on Mount Harris, which I hadn't seen
from Mount Exmouth because it was lost in the haze, but now I could see the
Warrumbungles and Mount Exmouth from Mount Harris. They were faint, but they
were there. Mr Oxley managed to see each from the other, so he must have been
lucky.
Mount Harris was named for John Harris, the surgeon who
patched up Governor Phillip after he was speared near my home in Manly. He also
gave his name to Harris Street, Ultimo, the Sydney home of the ABC, to Harris
Park in Sydney and to at least one other mountain.
In 1801, Harris went on the first expedition to study the
resources of the Hunter River, and a hillock there was labelled 'Mount Harris'
as well. It was used as a reference point while they were mapping the river,
but this mere pimple has since fallen off the map, so I went looking for it.
There's another hill on the Hunter, originally named Mount
Ann, and then dubbed Comerford's Hill, and if you go there as I did, it has a
road up it called 'Mount Harris Drive', but it's not the original Mount Harris
of 1801, so I was glad to have found the surgeon's second and rather more
important personal mountain out west. I'm glad I toddled up Oxley's Mount
Harris.
And looking back, I'm equally glad I went up Mount Exmouth,
but I probably wouldn't do it again on my own, and possibly not even in
company; one has to learn one's limitations with age. Or maybe one should
ignore the limitations and go out in style? Not just yet though, there are too
many Mount Harris-sized small mountains to walk up and sit on top of. I just
need to clarify my internal concept of 'small mountain' a bit. Small is
beautiful, but the genuinely small can be a joy forever.
Now make sure you read the preceding item in this blog.
Now make sure you read the preceding item in this blog.
I am finding this really funny - I am thinking you DIDN'T at the time.
ReplyDelete