This is a selection from my Big New Project, otherwise called Many Voices. I am giving it away for free as a PDF file of selected contemporary accounts of key (or interesting) points in Australian history, and where possible, I have added conflicting and/or corroborating accounts, as well as links to the original sources. This set of pieces comes from the National Library's Trove collection, but many of the most instructive bits in Many Voices come from little-known books which are, as it happens, available on Google Books or Project Gutenberg. At the very end of the PDF, there is a detailed bibliography which includes links to online sources.
Here, then, is a small taster.
* * * * * * *
Here, then, is a small taster.
* * * * * * *
[The standard meaning of “Anzac Day”, 25th April or
25th April, 1915, took a while to emerge, as these selections reveal.
The first “Anzac Day” also turned out to be rather less than a day of
reverence, as well.]
The first mention of the phrase “Anzac Day”, news report, 1915
ANZAC DAY
The Executive Committee of the MONSTER PROCESSION, PAGEANT,
and CARNIVAL to be held on WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 13, in aid of THE WOUNDED
SOLDIERS' FUND, has decided that the day shall be known as ANZAC DAY.
The Souvenir offered by the Committee to the person whose
suggestion for a title was adopted has been awarded to Mr. Robert Wheeler,
Prospect.
A. W. STYLES, Chairman. T. B. MERRY, Secretary.
Anzac Day Committee.
— The Advertiser (Adelaide), 28 August 1915, 2, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5478963
The Anzac Day souvenir, news report, 1915
ANZAC DAY SOUVENIR.
The committee of Anzac
Day intends to issue a souvenir programme, worthy of the occasion, and by
advertisement invites the public to provide designs for a cover. The committee
wishes to impress upon all those who decide to submit designs that, while the
artistic side will receive be consideration, the suitability of the design for
reproductions by letterpress printing will also carry weight. Printing houses
are also invited to tender tor the production of the souvenir proramme, and can
obtain particulars from Mr. W. C. Melbourne, at the Trades Hall. Mr. Alfred
Cave, of No. 6 Austral Chambers, Currie street, has undertaken to canvass for
advertisements for insertion in the souvenir programme; and the committee
hopes, for a ready response from business houses, as all profit accruing from
this source will be devoted to the Wounded Soldiers' Fund.
— The Register
(Adelaide), 1 September 1915, 11, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/59616676
Anzac Day tram collision plan, news report, 1915
The subcommittee
appointed by the Anzac Day committee to arrange the programme of attractions to
be presented at the Adelaide Oval on Anzac Day (Wednesday, October 13), are
busily engaged securing novelties for that occasion. Yesterday the subcommittee
waited upon Mr. W. G. T. Goodman (general manager and chief engineer of the
Adelaide Tramways Trust), and discussed with him the possibility of having a
sensational collision on the oval between two tramcars. Mr. Goodman met the
committee's suggestion in a most friendly and generous spirit, and promised
every assistance in his power. The idea is to lay sleepers and rails from end
to end of the oval, to fit up two obsolete cars with motors, then start them
from opposite ends of the oval, timed to meet at the centre in a thrilling
crash. This idea has been carried out in America between locomotives, and has
always attracted thousands of spectators. It would be practically impossible to
work locomotive "smash" on the Adelaide Oval, but the subcommittee,
with the assistance of Mr. Goodman, are quite sure that the tramcar collision
will provide sufficient thrill for one day, besides being one of the greatest
novelties ever seen in this city. A number of other new ideas are engaging the
attention of the subcommittee, and in the course of a few days announcements
will be made, which will show the public that the Anzac Day officials in tend
to make this a date to be remembered.
— Daily Herald (Adelaide), 4 September 1915, 4, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/105489278
Closing times for the Anzac Day holiday, news report, 1915
As the public holiday
(Anzac Day) will be kept on Wednesday, 13th inst., the alterations in the
closing times for shops will be slightly different from that which prevails
when a public holiday falls on Monday. The Chief Inspector of Factories and
Shops (Mr. J. Bannigan) has supplied the following explanation of the position
for the guidance of shopkeepers and others in the metropolitan and all country
districts under the provisions of the Early Closing Act: — The public
holiday, to be kept on Wednesday next does, not affect the closing times for
shops during this week, and during nest
week (the week in which the public holiday is to be kept) shop- keepers may
either adhere to their regular closing times or adopt one of the following
alternatives in lieu thereof, but these alternatives may only be applied to
shops that are kept closed for the whole of the public holiday, and all
assistants allowed off on that day. Nine o'clock on Tuesday, 12th, and 6
o'clock on all other evenings, including Saturday, 16th; or 9 o'clock on
Friday, 15th, and 6 o'clock on all other evenings: or 9 o'clock on Saturday,
16th, and 6 o'clock on all other evenings. That is to say, a shop may only be
kept open after 6 o'clock one of the three evenings named.
— The Mail (Adelaide), 9 October 1915, 8, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/59394082
A mention of “Anzac Day” from outside South Australia, news report, 1915
Mr. James referred to the "Anzac Day" celebration
which, was to be held in Adelaide in connection with the Eight Hours' Day
celebrations there the proceeds from which were to be utilised to swell the
South Australian Wounded Soldiers' Fund. He was convinced that it would be
impossible to get the South Australians to favor the federalisation of their
fund. It was, in his opinion, hopeless to try to do so. Nevertheless, it was a
fact that many of the people locally had subscribed to the fund believing, that
it was to be federally administered.
— Barrier Miner (Broken
Hill), 13 October 1915, 3, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/45354035#pstart3241169
The first Anzac Day, news report, 1915
ANZAC DAY. ADELAIDE, Wednesday. This year the Eight-hours
Day committee sacrificed the identity of its celebration by conducting a
carnival in aid of the wounded Soldiers' Fund. The committee was enlarged to
embrace all sections of the community, and the day was observed as Anzac Day.
Many thousands of people witnessed the street procession.
— The Sydney Morning
Herald, 14 October 1915, 10, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/15619228
The King William Street riots, news report, 1915
SOLDIERS AND POLICE
ANOTHER SERIOUS RIOT.
DISGRACEFUL SCENES IN
THE CITY.
TWO ARRESTS MADE.
Anzac Day in Adelaide will live long in the memory of many
people, not only on account of the big effort made to secure money for the
Wounded Soldiers' Fund, but because of the serious riot that occurred in King
William-street during the afternoon. As was the case when a similar disturbance
was witnessed in Hindley-street a few weeks ago, the ringleaders were soldiers
who, egged on by a disorderly mob, many of the members of which were women,
gave the police no end of trouble, engaging in a combat that reflects the
greatest discredit upon them as soldiers of the King. This was undoubtedly the
most serious riot that has occurred in Adelaide since the war began, and in
view of what the Military Commandant (Colonel Sandford) said after the previous
fracas, it is probable that some drastic action will be taken to prevent a
recurrence of the trouble. It would be a shocking state of affairs if men
wearing the King's uniform were allowed to ride roughshod over the civil
authorities, but the difficulty is how to deal with the matter, for it would be
grossly unfair to penalise the whole of the men in camp because some of their
number overstepped the bounds of prudence.
The Beginning of the
Trouble.
The disturbance had quite a mild beginning. Shortly after
3.30 p.m. two soldiers, more or less under the influence of liquor, came to
blows near the John Bull stables, in Currie-street. Constable Stephens appeared
on the scene, and the men, followed by onlookers, retired to the stables, where
they resumed hostilities. The constable went in to hunt them out, and he saw
one of the combatants get knocked down.
On rising to his feet that man made an
assault on a bystander, and it was then that the constable intervened. He
ordered the men away, but one soldier refused to go, and he arrested him on a
charge of drunkenness. The man did not resist arrest, and walked quietly along
Currie-street, but near King William-street a number of other soldiers came to
his assistance. He stopped, and refused to walk another inch, and the constable
said, "Well, I'll have to carry you," and lifted him off the ground.
Stephens had sent a lad to the other side of the street for Constable Keane,
and upon his arrival an attempt was made to remove the soldier to a cab nearby.
There were three cabs on the stand, and tbe police carried him to the back of
one, and were about to lift him in, when the driver of the vehicle whipped up
his horses and left them standing there. They then endeavored to get the
prisoner into another cab, but the man in charge served them the same trick as
the other driver. Nothing daunted, they pushed their way through the crowd,
which was now becoming very hostile, and reached a cab near the United Service
Hotel.
The Crowd Interfere.
There were at this stage a couple of thousand people on the
spot, and when it was seen that the soldier's mouth was bleeding they accused
the police of having struck him with a baton. The vehicle was thickly
surrounded by soldiers, who, encouraged by a bevy of women, tried to prevent
the police from getting the man, who was wearing spurs and kicking out wildly,
into the cab. They pushed and jostled the officers of the law, who also had to
contend with interference from a number of civilians.
At last Constables
Stephens, Simpson, and Keane succeeded in pulling the soldier into the vehicle.
By this time Constables Hannon, Lillywhite, Griffin, Feudeloff, and Reilly gave
assistance in keeping back the surging mob. They drew their batons, and one man
declared that he received a blow on the face from one of them. Further trouble
was experienced by the officers, for no sooner had they made their man secure
in the cab than some bystanders tampered with the harness, the traces being
pulled off and the reins being untied at the bridles.
Constable Griffin put the
harness in order again, but now the driver of the cab shook his head, and would
not move his horse off. This greatly pleased the disorderly mob, who cheered
the driver. A member of the military police endeavored to render assistance,
and it was generally believed when he got into the front of the cab that the
arrested man would be taken away to camp. The crowd then allowed the vehicle to
move off, and it was driven along King William-street and down Currie-street, and
by a roundabout route to the City Watch-house, Constables Stephens and Simpson
remaining in charge. At the police-station the prisoner gave the name of Dennis
McCourt, and he will come before the Adelaide Police Court this morning.
Another Riot.
Shortly after the cab had disappeared from sight another
riotous scene occurred near the United Service Hotel. A young, strongly-built
man, who appeared to be suffering from the effects of alcohol, was holding
forth to those nearby upon the police force generally, making abusive remarks
regarding the men in blue. Constable Feudeloff ordered the man to move on or he
would arrest him for drunkenness.
On receiving a refusal the constable took
hold of him, and then began one of the hottest struggles in which a policeman
has ever taken part. Fists were flying in all directions, but the constable
clung to his man and tried to get him under control. The pair fought across the
footpath to the main entrance to the United Service Hotel, where on account of
interference from soldiers and others the constable drew his baton. In a
twinkling a man whipped up from inside the hotel, snatched the baton from his
hand, and darted through the premises to a back lane.
Feudeloff let go his
prisoner and raced off after the man who had stolen his baton, but before he
had gone far along the passage way a stout woman got in front of him and
endeavored to bar his way. Quickly ducking under her arm he continued the
chase, and overtook his quarry near Waymouth-street. He walked him without molestation
into King William-street, where a cab was requisitioned, and at the
police-station this man gave his name as Allen Dalziell. He will also come
before the court this morning.
Police in a Tight
Corner.
When Constable Feudeloff ran through the hotel Constable
Simmons, who was in plain clothes, chased the man who had been released, and
soon recaptured him. Several uniformed police look charge of him, and he was
taken to a cab near the Bank of Adelaide. He resisted violently all the way,
and fought and jumped about when the cab was reached. There the soldiers in the
crowd took his part, because they considered he had helped them when the first
man was being arrested.
They pushed the police this way and that, but the
officers hung tenaciously to the prisoner and got him into the vehicle with
great difficulty. The man in charge of the cab stated that he could not drive
the horses, as the driver had gone away for a while. Constable Wells, the
Registrar of Motor Vehicles, thereupon jumped into the driver's seat, but he
failed to get the animals away, as somebody had cut the traces. That left the
police powerless to move, and while Constables Crowley and Keane were holding
the prisoner down the crowd attempted to push the vehicle over on its side.
Twice they lifted the right side wheels some distance off the ground, and on
one occasion it appeared as if the cab would capsize.
The prisoner kept calling
out for the crowd to help, and he made a strenuous effort to get out of the
side of the cab. Then a man appeared near him with a coil of rope, and
Senior-Constable Reilly promptly grabbed him by the throat and pushed him out
of harm's way. The police were in a quandary what to do for some time, for they
could not allow their quarry to go, and they could not move from the position
they were in.
A woman, who said the captive was her son, then stepped to the
back of the cab, and she saved the situation by giving the name of her boy,
which she said was Davoren. Senior-Constable Reilly there upon decided to allow
the fellow to go, and the crowd soon rushed him off to the United Service
Hotel, hooting the police on the way. An elderly man stood up in the cab and
appealed for money to enable the driver to get his traces mended, and the
required sum was forthcoming.
No Mounted Constables
About.
During the disturbance there was not a mounted constable in
sight, and it was not till long afterwards that three troopers put in an
appearance. Had they come earlier no doubt the foot constables would not have
experienced great difficulty in removing the three men to the watch-house.
— The Advertiser
(Adelaide), 14 October 1915, 9, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5483759
The Anzac Day riots, news report, 1915
LAW COURTS. THE STREET RIOT.
Incidents connected with the riot in King William-street on
Anzac Day were again related in the Adelaide Police Court on Tuesday, when
Allen Dalziell was charged with having hindered Constable Feudeloff in the
execution of his duty, namely, while he was arresting John Davoren on a charge
of drunkenness. On the bench were Messrs. T. W. Fleming, S.M., J. C. Jurs, H.
Wells, and I. Isaacs. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and was defended by Mr.
R. G. Nesbit. Sub-Inspector Edwards prosecuted.
Constable Feudeloff said that at about 4.15 p.m. on Anzac
Day he was near the United Service Hotel in King William-street. There was a
crowd of people on the road and in the centre was a man named John Davoren, who
was drunk. The witness ordered him to move on, and he staggered away three or
four yards, and stopped. He was singing out m a loud tone, and the crowd were
in a very excited condition. He arrested Davoren, who struggled and threw
himself on the ground. The witness got him on to his feet again, when a number
of soldiers and civilians charged the witness, who was kicked and jostled and
knocked about.
He held on to the prisoner with his left hand, and drew his
baton with the other hand to protect himself. The defendant Dalziell came up
and caught hold of his right arm and pulled him away from Davoren. He then
snatched his staff and ran away. The witness caught him and got his staff, and
Dalziell struck him with his fists, again pulled the baton away, and ran
through the passage of the hotel. The witness went, through the passageway and
saw defendant being held by J. C. Gittings. As soon as he saw the witness
following the defendant ran into Waymouth-place, where he was captured.
Dalziell was taken to the watch-house, where he said, "I'll admit I took
the constable's baton, but I did it so that he would not hit me."
Mr. Nesbit—The moment you arrested Davoren did you become
very unpopular with the crowd?—I did.
There was a lot of jeering and hooting? —Yes.
In fact, the thing degenerated into a riot directed against,
you?—Yes.
J. C. Gittings, a stereotyper, said the crowd did not give
the constable a fair deal, and they incited Davoren to resist. Near the hotel
entrance he saw the constable holding Davoren, and the defendant came up and
snatched the baton from his hand. The witness took hold of Dalziell, to whom
the witness appealed to return the baton. Dalziell immediately gave up
possession of it.
Constable Canavan also gave evidence.
Mr. Nesbit said the defendant was recently employed as chief
inspector of the Motorbus Company, and left to go into camp If there was any
interference on his part it was quite unintentional. Mr. Neshitt considered it
was a case of mistaken identity.
The defendant said he was an assistant quartermaster in the
Expeditionary Force, and was in the non-commissioned officers' school. He went
to the United Service Hotel with a friend. He denied that he struggled with the constable, or took his baton away.
Sub-Inspector Edwards-Do you mean to say that you never had
possession of the baton ?—Yes.
John James Stapleton, conductor in the employ of the
Tramways Trust, Roland G. Jenkins, barman at the United Service Hotel, and
Private Brown gave corroborative evidence
The S.M. said that the evidence was very strongly
contradictory. The bench had come to the conclusion that the defendant was
there and had hindered the police, but they felt that they wanted to give him
credit for his previous good record. The police had to be protected. They had a
very arduous duty to perform, especially on a day like Anzac Day, and the help
they might have expected was not rendered. Two witnesses for the prosecution
had sworn to having heard the defendant say in the City Watch-house that he had
had the baton. Probably Dalziell had allowed his feelings to run away with him.
The bench were not going to impose any thing like the maximum penalty, but the
defendant would have to pay £2, with £1 costs, or go to gaol for seven days.
— The Advertiser
(Adelaide), 20 October 1915, 14, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5484345#pstart973611
An Anzac Day in Gippsland, news report, 1915
ANOTHER "BUTTON DAY." The various tents which
administer so much to the comfort and care of our soldiers, whether in camp in
the States, in Egypt or at Gallipoli, being in need of assistance, the Lord
Mayor's Central "Button" Committee has fixed to-morrow as
"Anzac" day, and have issued at special "remembrance"
button to be sold throughout the Commonwealth at the usual price of 1/, the
proceeds to be divided between all the tents working for the welfare of those
under arms either at home or the front, viz., Y.M.C.A., Churches of England,
Presbyterian, Roman Catholic, Methodist, and Salvation Army. On receipt of a
request to assist the work locally, the Mayor (Cr. Lyon) convened a meeting of
those ladies who had made "Allies"' day such a success, to arrange if
thought fit for a Sale effort in aid of the good cause. The gathering was held
in the Mayor's room, and was fully representative. The Mayor was authorised to
order 1000 "Anzac" buttons, which has been done.
— Gippsland Times
(Victoria), 16 December 1915, 3, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/62380709#pstart6055224
The first April 25 Anzac Day, news report, 1916
ANZAC DAY. Proposed Celebration in Brisbane.
A public meeting will be held in the Exhibition Hall this
evening to discuss the steps to be taken for the celebration of Anzac Day on
April 25. The Mayor of Brisbane (Alderman Down) will occupy the chair, and the
speakers will include his Excellency the Governor (Sir H. J. Goold-Adams),
Major-General McCay (Inspector-General of the Australian Imperial Forces), the
Premier (Hon. T. J. Ryan), and Chaplain Lieutenant-Colonel Garland. It is hoped
there will be a large attendance of the general public and also of returned
soldiers.
— The Brisbane Courier,
10 January 1916, 8, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/20056569
The name Anzac Day is fixed, news report, 1916
I met Mr. W. Copley, ex-M.P., and Minister of the Crown, in
the street on Thursday, and I could not help congratulating him on his
remarkably hale and hearty appearance (writes 'Rufus,' in Saturday's Journal).
"Well, I was 70 years old last birthday," remarked the gentleman from
Blackrock, "and I am not likely to forget it, because it was April 25,
Anzac Day."
— The Register
(Adelaide), 10 January 1916, 4, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/59807896#pstart4546868
What Anzac Means, Pearce, 1916
[By April 25, 1916, the modern sense of "Anzac Day" was cl;early understood. Senator Pearce was Minister for Defence, but released this
article as the Acting Prime Minister, on Anzac Day, 1916. It appeared in just
six Australian newspapers in that week.]
In an army a knowledge of its past achievements is a mighty
factor in its future success. Before this war Australia had practically no army
traditions, and it is to the meaning of the Gallipoli campaign in this
connection that I would direct attention to-day, twelve months after the
historic landing.
To the peoples of Europe the thought of war was ever present
in the popular mind; but to the Australian, born and bred in an atmosphere
untainted by war, living amid peaceful surroundings and desirous of remaining
on terms of friendship with the rest of mankind the word itself has a jarring
sound. Yet the German challenge to the Mother Country finds 233,720 of her Australian
sons who have voluntarily wrenched themselves from their parents, wives, and
friends, and from comfortable and cheerful homes, to answer the call of their
country to fight the Empire's battles on distant shores.
Nor has the thunder of the cannon been necessary to inspire
Australians with a conception of their duty; and the explanation of it all is
that we have inherited to the full that spirit of our forebears which enabled
them, not so long ago, to tear themselves from homeland firesides to shape
careers in this great island continent, and to overcome with indomitable pluck
the awful hardships of a pioneering life.
For generations to come the story of the entry of the
Australian troops to the European battlefield will ring in the ears of
English-speaking nations. The chronicler of the future will provide many
thrilling pages of history, magnificent material for the moulding of the
youthful Australian character.
A distinguished military officer told us before the war that
Australians would require to be in the majority of two to one in meeting a
foreign foe on our own shores; but the furious onslaught that accompanied the
landing at Gallipoli, the bitter fighting and terrible trials of the
occupation, and the wonderful skill that made possible the bloodless evacuation
have shown us that the Australians carried out a feat of arms not excelled by
the most highly-trained regulars of any nation of the world. The following
messages are eloquent in their tribute to Australian bravery:
“I heartily congratulate you upon the splendid conduct and bravery displayed by the Australian troops in the operations at the Dardanelles, who have indeed proved themselves worthy sons of the Empire.” — His Majesty the King, April 1915.
“The capture of the positions we hold will go down to history as a magnificent feat of the Australians and New Zealanders.” — General Sir William Birdwood, November 1915.“Happen what may, the Australians who have fought at Gallipoli will bequeath a heritage of honour to their children's children.” — General Sir Ian Hamilton, November 1915.
These are examples of the praise which that feat of arms has
won, and such is the standing of military bearing which the improvised army of
Australian citizens has set up for the citizen army of Australia — a standard
which, we may rest assured, has not failed to impress our enemies in computing
the military value of our forces.
Every unit of the citizen army will now have its tradition.
Every soldier of the Australian army will have that inspiring example of the
Anzac heroes to live up to in his military work, and we can regard the future
with a calm confidence in the military prowess of our soldiers.
— The Australasian,
29 April 1916, 43, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/142991438
Other war history
I don't really like writing military history, even though I once won an award for doing so. It's too sad, and involves too many stupid people making stupid decisions, but I'm not going to discuss Blamey today, or MacArthur, to name my two top favourite idiots.
Let me share with you a message of hope that came out of a visit to Gallipoli in 2002, and the sad story, and a sad story of patriotism gone mad in a time of distress.
General note that I am adding to some of my blog entries: I have lots of different interests. If some area interests you, look at the very end and you will see a set of tags called labels. These are hot links that will give you a list of other articles with the same tag/label.